![实用关节镜手术学](https://wfqqreader-1252317822.image.myqcloud.com/cover/89/917089/b_917089.jpg)
第三章 关节功能评价
第一节 肩关节功能评分
一、UCLA肩关节评分系统
UCLA评分系统
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00052001.jpg?sign=1739313777-0DAJPeeEleNYHmR0Cx0eBgFhI8Dw2XrM-0-0056e6e20700b3a268ada6e75ddbb5de)
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00053001.jpg?sign=1739313777-WCOgZLeS3XRlIUiMBC69ZH7NyixOnfli-0-a476ef9a80acba27dfd9c91927ad00b9)
注:1.UCLA即The university of California-Los Angeles的缩写。
2.肩关节评分系统总分为35分。优为34~35分;良为29~33分;差为<29分。
3.来源:Ellman H,Hanker G,Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff: End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1986,68:1136-1144.
二、Constant和Murley肩关节评分
Constant和Murley肩关节评分
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00053002.jpg?sign=1739313777-iUgRtQ0L0rldMHt95G05QFabmNgOrgzK-0-bfd6a17de978765e571e281c52926c40)
来源:Constant C R,Murley A H G. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop,1987,214:160-164.
三、美国肩肘外科评分
美国肩肘外科评分(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scale)
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00054002.jpg?sign=1739313777-JTdw7VpwbUcB7SuQv0Db8nKYH5rVtrpi-0-ab3ffd426d3a63be0c52514de73297db)
来源:Richards R R,An K-N,Rigliani L U,et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1994,3:347-352.
四、Rowes评分系统
Rowes评分(Rowes Rating System for Bankart Repair)主要用于评价肩关节Bankart损伤手术后疗效评价,分值权重侧重于肩关节的稳定性。优为100~90分;良为89~75分;可为74~51分;差为50或50以下。
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00055001.jpg?sign=1739313777-nkdMBtRk9nSEDtzF1DcEx8hEQ4DkWtHo-0-299333612d7477c82694b94ac0ef6935)
来源:Rowe CR,Patel D,Southmayd WW. The Bankart procedure:A long term end-result study. J Bone Joint Sury(Am).1978,60:1-16.
五、HSS肩关节评分系统
HSS(hospital for special surgery shoulder-rating score sheet)用于肩峰撞击综合征、肩峰成形术的疗效评价。比较注重对于疼痛的评定。优为90~100分;良为70~89分;可为50~69分;差为50分以下。
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00055002.jpg?sign=1739313777-768vWpnXQZCfb5KPqmaMqxuvT7fZytnO-0-92c6ed10474fdc2e1b1f7d471515fe3f)
源自:Altcheck D W,Warren R F,Wickiewiez T L,et al. Arthroscopic acromioplasty. Technique and result. J Bone Joint Sury(Am),1990,72:1198-1207.
六、国人肩关节功能评分表
1.疼痛与夜间痛(20分)
带刻度VAS评分,两端表示极端情况,让患者自己划出疼痛状况。
(1)疼痛量表(10分)
(2)夜间痛量表(10分)
2.生活相关的功能活动(27分)
总计9条,能完成1条记为3分。
3.肌力和关节活动度(32分)
①肩部肌力(12分,双侧对比进行)
②肩关节活动度(20分)
4.医患满意度(21分)
医患双方分别在自己的VAS线上评出满意度,最后用满意度表盖上得出分数。
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00058001.jpg?sign=1739313777-2fAHDMdfiZ5IzYsEBZgux8utqUMGypnn-0-26165355ab99352a2e9c7d308f5213eb)
(来自:复旦大学华山医院陈世益中国人肩关节功能评分系统的研究与制定)